Review and meta-studies away from quantitative characteristic loci (QTL) impacting leaf corrosion opposition for the grain

Review and meta-studies away from quantitative characteristic loci (QTL) impacting leaf corrosion opposition for the grain
Evaluation density directory.

In order to photo places oftentimes involved in the hereditary power over leaf corrosion opposition, brand new QTL-evaluation thickness directory (Chardon et al. 200cuatro) are determined (Fig. step three). That it figure increases from inside the a district that have (i) just how many QTL of more studies, (ii) the fresh proximity between QTL ranks, and (iii) the accuracy of the individual QTL condition quote.

Fig. step three. This new assessment figure is determined the 1 centimorgan (cM) and you will plotted with each other per chromosome (blue contour). A couple lateral dotted outlines will be mediocre property value the new figure (0.055) in addition to endurance getting higher thinking (0.2eight5), identified as five times the common really worth (Chardon et al. 2004). Taverns below the evaluation contour depict brand new wheat chromosomes where QTL was projected. Light gray (green) boxes represent meta-QTL harboring about 2 QTL, whereas dark gray (red) boxes portray unique QTL. Positions away from before mapped Lr genetics when you look at the grain is actually illustrated by triangles lower than chromosome taverns; Lr genetics colocalized having meta-QTL is actually expressed into the deep gray (blue).

New overview directory try determined all of the centimorgan and you may rates was basically gotten for every single of your own 144 projected QTL (Fig. 3). As a whole, 52 assessment highs was gotten, from which 47 exceeded an average value of new fact (0.055) over the genome and you will represented genomic gorgeous areas getting leaf corrosion resistance. Of one’s 47 highs, twenty five demonstrated beliefs exceeding new highest-worthy of tolerance (0.275) (Fig. 3). Exactly how many highs exceeding an average tolerance ranged from one inside chromosome 4A and you can 7A in order to four in the chromosomes 1B, 2D, and you may 7B. Into second, all the four peaks plus exceeded new large-well worth threshold.

QTL meta-analysis.

The newest 144 QTL projected on the Wheat Compound 2004 chart was indeed confronted with meta-analysis using the features off Goffinet and Gerber (2000) in the event the amount of QTL in good chromosome was below ten and those out of Veyrieras mais aussi al. (2007) if amount try ten or even more. Following the an enthusiastic AIC, 141 QTL was labeled on the forty eight MQTL (Dining table dos). The software don’t think about three QTL getting meta-investigation because of their reduced LOD get thinking or high Au moment ou. In most, thirty five MQTL, comprising 128 QTL, was in fact the consequence of the fresh consolidation with a minimum of dos QTL, and you may thirteen QTL remained since unique QTL (Table 2).

a for the top area of the desk reveals MQTL spanning at the very least one or two clustered QTL and also the all the way down area reveals QTL kept since book QTL.

c AUDPC = town under the problem advances bend, DS = condition seriousness, EA = very early aborted territories, EST = charmdate mobile built colonies, Ie = disease show, It = illness kind of, LIA = leaf contaminated urban area, LP = latent several months, LR = leaf resistance, LS = lesion dimensions, LTN = leaf idea necrosis, NEC = necrotic colonies, SPL = spore manufacturing for each lesion, and you may SPS = spore design for every product from sporulating structure.

Chromosome MQTL Position (cM) Si (95%) Flanking markers QTL (n) b Characteristic c Opposition provider
1A MQTL1 Xfba254–Xwmc95b 4 AUDPC, DS Apache, Sujata
1B MQTL2 1.8six Xcdo98.2–Xmwg837b 6 AUDPC, DS, They, LTN Forno, MG5323, Oberkulmer, Pastor, Sujata
MQTL3 8.46 Xbarc81–Xfba294 2 AUDPC, DS Bainong 64
MQTL4 dos.ten Xfba266c–XksuI27 2 DS Pastor, Pavon 76
MQTL5 0.twenty eight XksuI27–Xbarc80 2 AUDPC, DS Francolin#step one
2A MQTL6 4.62 Xglk554–Xcmwg682b 2 AUDPC Colosseo, Forno
2B MQTL7 step three.68 Xgwm55–Xgwm429 4 AUDPC, DS, They Carberry, Kariega, Avocet S, W-7984
MQTL8 Xwmc265–Xgwm877.1 7 AUDPC, DS, LP Apache, Creso
2D MQTL9 nine.thirty two Xgwm455–Xbcd718 3 AUDPC, DS Harmony, Forno, MN99394-1
MQTL10 8.forty Xfba74a–Xgwm30.1 3 AUDPC, DS, LTN Forno, Pastor
MQTL11 4.11 Xcdo1008–Xksud23a 6 AUDPC, DS, SPS Balance
3A MQTL12 6.73 Xcdo1345–Xgwm2 2 LR, LTN Forno, Oberkulmer
MQTL13 Xcfa2134–XgbxG242 2 They, LIA TA4152-sixty
MQTL14 dos.thirty-two Xmwg570–Xcdo113 2 AUDPC, LIA Lloyd
3B MQTL15 2.08 XksuG30a–Xgwm533a 9 DS, Ie, It, LIA, LP, SPL Harmony, Capo, Opata 85
MQTL16 0.89 Xgwm566–Xgwm888.step 3 3 DS, It, LIA Francolin#step 1, TA4152-sixty
4A MQTL17 XgbxR247–Xpsr593.2 2 DS, It Opata 85
4B MQTL18 Xgwm495a–Xcsu25 3 AUDPC, DS Avocet S, Creso, Forno
MQTL19 Xgwm131.2–Xmwg11a 2 DS, LTN Carberry, Oberkulmer
4D MQTL20 dos.50 Xbarc98–Xfbb336 3 AUDPC, It, LIA Sujata, TA4252-60
MQTL21 Xcdo1312a–Xfba177b 4 AUDPC, DS, LS, SPL Balance
5B MQTL22 cuatro.79 Xbarc4–Xgwm371 2 AUDPC, DS Kariega, SHA3/CBRD
MQTL23 8.83 Xpsp3065–Xgwm118 5 It, LIA, LTN Americano 25e, Capo, Carberry, TA4152-60
6A MQTL24 Xmwg67.1–XksuH4.2 6 AUDPC, DS, LP Balance
6B MQTL25 S25M19_7–Xcdo476.2 2 AUDPC, DS Bainong 64
MQTL26 Gpc-B1–Xwmc388a 2 AUDPC, DS Bainong 65
MQTL27 Xgwm133b–Xfbb130 2 DS, It Pavon 76, TA4152-60
MQTL28 6.91 Xbarc134–Xwmc417b 2 AUDPC, DS Kariega, Pastor
7A MQTL29 4.73 XWC2028g–P78/M49.cuatro 5 AUDPC, DS Balance
7B MQTL30 step 3.58 Xwmc335–Xgwm68.2 5 AUDPC, DS, LIA Colosseo, Forno, Kariega, SHA3/CBRD
MQTL31 dos.17 S25M15_19–Xgwm112 4 DS, They, LTN MG5323, Oberkulmer
MQTL32 4.42 Xwmc273c–Xwmc311 4 AUDPC, DS, LTN Forno, Oberkulmer, Opata 85, Pastor
MQTL33 0.53 Xgwm577–Xbarc340.2 11 AUDPC, DS, EA, EST, LIA, LP, NEC Colosseo, Creso, Sujata
7D MQTL34 step 1.75 Xbcd1438–Xcnl6b 3 AUDPC, DS, LTN Forno, MN98550-5
MQTL35 nine.39 Xgwm44–Xcfa2174c 2 DS, LTN Oberkulmer, Opata 85
1A 123.5 Xwmc237–XksuE11.1a 1 DS SHA3/CBRD
1B six.thirteen XksuF43.1–Xabc155c 1 LIA Capo
2A Xfbb329–Xgwm339 1 LP Creso
step three.09 Xfbb353.2–Xglk554 1 LIA Colosseo
2B 4.98 Xwmc344–XksuD22 1 LIA Capo
cuatro.twenty-seven Xfba310.1–Xbcd1231 1 LIA Capo
2D Xwmc243–Xgwm608.step three 1 DS SHA3/CBRD
5A 2.00 5.55 Xcnl6b–Xgwm154a 1 LTN Oberkulmer
Xbcd508–Xfbb255x 1 DS Pastor
Xwg114a–P43/M62-5 1 EA Creso
6A nine.88 Sr26–P38/M51-cuatro 1 LTN Oberkulmer
7D step 3.forty eight XgbxG564–Yr18 1 DS Opata 85
Xgwm121–Xbarc53 1 LTN Carberry
July 13, 2022

0 responses on "Review and meta-studies away from quantitative characteristic loci (QTL) impacting leaf corrosion opposition for the grain"

Leave a Message

top
Ag Prep © All rights reserved.